Team-based morbidity and mortality conferences (TBMMs) involve multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary teams in discussions about complex cases and medical errors. This survey of 1,466 perioperative health care professionals found positive perceptions of TBMMs and traditional Morbidity and Mortality Conferences, but identified several barriers to effective implementation of TBMMs, including unsupportive leadership and fear of professional consequences.

Morbidity and mortality conferences offer important opportunities for healthcare teams to discuss adverse events, learn from errors, and improve patient safety. This systematic review examined beneficial aspects of perioperative team-based morbidity and mortality (TBMM) conferences. The authors found that TBMM conferences generally led to improvements in patient safety, quality improvement, and educational outcomes and that certain factors (case preparation, standardized presentation format, effective facilitation) increase TBMM benefits.

In the United States, women and birthing people of color experience disproportionately high rates of mortality and severe maternal morbidity (SMM). Researchers analyzed two years of incident reports (IR) to ascertain potential system issues contributing to SMM and racial/ethnic disparities at one hospital. Non-Hispanic Black individuals were over-represented in IRs, but there were no statistically significant differences in harm level.

Root cause analysis (RCA) may not be an ideal process, but it still creates opportunities for learning and improvement after a sentinel event. This article posits why perioperative nurses may not report problems to avoid engagement in RCA activities. Increasing nurse awareness of RCA as a multidisciplinary and systems-focused improvement method is a suggested educational tactic to increase nurse RCA participation.

Reporting and learning from adverse events are core components of patient safety. In this qualitative study involving 15 surgeons from four academic hospitals in Norway, researchers identified several individual and structural factors influencing serious adverse events as well as both positive and negative implications of transparency regarding adverse events. The authors highlight the importance of systemic learning and structural changes to foster psychological safety and create space for safe discussions after adverse events.

While medical trainees and residents agree that disclosing errors to patients is important, they also perceive barriers to doing so. In this study, surgical trainees described factors influencing their decisions not to disclose errors despite their intention to do so. Even with formal communication trainings throughout the program, participants reported a lack of sufficient education in error disclosure. Workplace culture and role-modelling influenced their own disclosure practices both positively and negatively.

Medical errors in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are common and can result in significant patient harm. This prospective observational study conducted at 10 NICUs in France found that approximately 41% of the 1,822 errors (among 1,019 patients) were disclosed to the patient’s parents. Providers cited parental absence (i.e., the error occurred overnight) and perceived lack of serious consequences for the infant as the most frequent reason for non-disclosure.

Patients and families expect full, timely disclosure after incidents. This realist synthesis examines research on patient disclosure to inform what is required to strengthen disclosure in maternity care. Five key themes were identified, including meaningful acknowledgment of harm and opportunities for patients and families to be involved in the follow-up.

If reported, near misses – also called “good catches” – present opportunities for healthcare organizations to learn about potential errors, identify system improvements, and improve safety culture. This mixed-methods study including 199 nurses, who worked in COVID-19 units, found that intent to report near misses was high (78%) but follow-through on reporting was low (20%). Qualitative analyses highlight the role that personnel/physical/mental overload, poor departmental organization, and fear of punitive measures play in underreporting near-miss events.

Black patients who report experiencing racism in healthcare report poorer quality of care. In this text-message based study, Black and White patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) were asked about their overall quality of care and whether they perceived an impact of their race on their care. While Black patients reported high overall quality of care, 10% believed their race negatively impacted their care. The authors highlight the importance of asking about the impact of race on care to identify and reduce potential disparities.

Patient engagement and encouragement to speak up about their care can promote patient safety. This qualitative study explored patients’ psychosocial experiences after surviving abdominal surgery complications. Findings highlight an overarching theme of vulnerability and how power imbalances between patients and healthcare professionals can influence speaking up behaviors.

Racial and ethnic health disparities are receiving increased attention, and yet structural racism continues to negatively impact communities of color. This review identified only six papers studying the impact of structural racism on severe maternal morbidity (SMM). Despite heterogeneity in measures and outcomes, the studies all demonstrated a link between structural racism and SMM; additional research is required.

Patients and families can contribute unique insights into medical errors. This qualitative evidence review concluded that patients and families value involvement in patient safety incident investigations but highlight the importance of addressing the emotional aspects of care (e.g., timely apology, prioritizing trust and transparency). Healthcare staff perceived patient and family involvement in investigations to be important, but cited several barriers (e.g., staff turnover, fears of litigation) to effective investigations.

Burnout in healthcare providers has been linked to lower patient safety and increased adverse events. This systematic review examined studies focusing on the relationship between burnout and patient safety and professionalism in surgeons. Results indicate higher rates of burnout and emotional exhaustion were associated with an increased risk of involvement in medical error. Interventions to reduce burnout and improve surgeon well-being may result in improved patient safety.

Peer support programs are increasingly used to support clinicians involved in adverse events. This evaluation found that a structured peer support program for providers involved in obstetric adverse events can effectively support providers in short periods of time (for example, 92% of participants did not need follow-up after second peer support contact) and can be initiated with limited resources.