Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study

Comparison of computerized surveillance and manual chart review for adverse events.

Tinoco A, Evans S, Staes CJ, et al. Comparison of computerized surveillance and manual chart review for adverse events. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(4):491-7. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000187.

Save
Print
June 29, 2011
Tinoco A, Evans S, Staes CJ, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(4):491-7.
View more articles from the same authors.

This study found that computerized surveillance systems detected more hospital-acquired infections than manual chart review, but both methods detected similar rates of adverse drug events. The authors discuss the tradeoffs of each surveillance method and highlight how each system used information from different sources.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Tinoco A, Evans S, Staes CJ, et al. Comparison of computerized surveillance and manual chart review for adverse events. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(4):491-7. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000187.

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)
Related Resources