Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study

Is detection of adverse events affected by record review methodology? An evaluation of the "Harvard Medical Practice Study" method and the "Global Trigger Tool."

Unbeck M, Schildmeijer K, Henriksson P, et al. Is detection of adverse events affected by record review methodology? an evaluation of the "Harvard Medical Practice Study" method and the "Global Trigger Tool". Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7(1):10. doi:10.1186/1754-9493-7-10.

Save
Print
May 8, 2013
Unbeck M, Schildmeijer K, Henriksson P, et al. Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7(1):10.
View more articles from the same authors.

This comparison of two different methodologies for retrospectively detecting safety events found that the methodology used in the Harvard Medical Practice Study was more accurate than that used in the Global Trigger Tool.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Unbeck M, Schildmeijer K, Henriksson P, et al. Is detection of adverse events affected by record review methodology? an evaluation of the "Harvard Medical Practice Study" method and the "Global Trigger Tool". Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7(1):10. doi:10.1186/1754-9493-7-10.

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)
Related Resources