Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study
Classic

Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery.

Kwaan MR, Studdert DM, Zinner MJ, et al. Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery. Arch Surg. 2006;141(4):353-7; discussion 357-8.

Save
Print
April 19, 2006
Kwaan MR, Studdert DM, Zinner MJ, et al. Arch Surg. 2006;141(4):353-7; discussion 357-8.
View more articles from the same authors.

This AHRQ-supported study analyzed information from nearly 3 million operations between 1985 and 2004, discovering a rate of 1 in 112,994 cases of wrong-site surgery. Investigators further evaluated cases with available medical records, all of which were among the malpractice claims. In doing so, they noted that the Joint Commission's Universal Protocol might have prevented only 62% of the cases reviewed. At the rates reported, the authors suggest that the average large hospital may be involved in such an event every 5 to 10 years, a rate 10 times less frequent than retained foreign bodies. They also point out that while wrong-site surgery is a devastating and unacceptable outcome, current efforts to implement protocols may not prevent every event and may, in turn, create inefficiency in related processes. The authors offer a series of recommendations for a model site-verification protocol. The American College of Surgeons offers a fact sheet on correct-site surgery geared toward patient education.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Kwaan MR, Studdert DM, Zinner MJ, et al. Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery. Arch Surg. 2006;141(4):353-7; discussion 357-8.

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)
Related Resources