Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study
Classic

Changes in outcomes for internal medicine inpatients after work-hour regulations.

Horwitz LI, Kosiborod M, Lin Z, et al. Changes in outcomes for internal medicine inpatients after work-hour regulations. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(2):97-103.

Save
Print
June 27, 2007
Horwitz LI, Kosiborod M, Lin Z, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(2):97-103.
View more articles from the same authors.

The 2003 regulations reducing housestaff duty hours have been controversial. Although some research has shown fewer errors when housestaff worked shorter shifts, many commentators have raised concern about the potential for errors associated with more transfers of care between physicians. This study sought to directly examine the effect of duty hours limitations on clinical outcomes by comparing medical patients hospitalized on a resident service to patients on a non-teaching service before and after duty hour reduction. There was no detectable increase in adverse events among patients cared for by residents, and some outcomes improved (eg, potential medication errors). Another study in the same issue also found reduced inpatient mortality among medical (but not surgical) patients after implementation of duty hour limitations. The accompanying editorial discusses these two studies in the context of growing evidence that limiting work hours "does no harm" to patients.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Horwitz LI, Kosiborod M, Lin Z, et al. Changes in outcomes for internal medicine inpatients after work-hour regulations. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(2):97-103.

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)
Related Resources