Narrow Results Clear All
- Culture of Safety 3
- Education and Training 1
- Error Reporting and Analysis 2
- Human Factors Engineering 3
- Legal and Policy Approaches
- Quality Improvement Strategies 3
- Teamwork 1
- Technologic Approaches 1
Search results for "Incentives"
- Intensive Care Units
Bethesda, MD: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. May 21, 2018. PA-18-790; PA-18-791.
Journal Article > Study
Naessens J, Campbell CR, Shah N, et al. Am J Med Qual. 2012;27:48-57.
The epidemiology of adverse events on a population basis has been well studied, but how these data translate to risks for individual patients is not as clear. The likelihood of suffering an adverse event is directly tied to length of hospitalization, and this study sought to evaluate a complementary question: whether patients who are more severely ill at admission are at increased risk of preventable harm. By linking adverse event data from various sources—including Patient Safety Indicators, voluntary error reports, and infection control reports—to clinical databases, the authors were able to show that higher illness severity is associated with an increased risk of adverse events during hospitalization. These findings are supported by the fact that intensive care unit patients have consistently been shown to experience more adverse events. An AHRQ WebM&M commentary discusses a case of a medication error occurring in an acutely ill patient with multiple underlying comorbidities.
Journal Article > Study
The business case for quality: economic analysis of the Michigan Keystone Patient Safety Program in ICUs.
Waters HR, Korn R Jr, Colantuoni E, et al. Am J Med Qual. 2011;26:333-339.
One of the seminal achievements in the patient safety field, the Keystone ICU project accomplished impressive short-term and long-term reductions in health care–associated infections in Michigan ICUs by implementing checklists and improving safety culture. This follow-up study also demonstrates the cost-effectiveness of the program, as the money saved by preventing infections greatly outweighed the cost of the intervention itself. Substantiating the business case for quality in this fashion will further stimulate wide dissemination of proven safety interventions.
Grant M. AARP The Magazine. September/October 2010;53:48-51,90-91.
The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. September 23, 2008.
Through his work, Peter Pronovost, a critical care physician and professor at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, has inspired culture change by devising evidence-based clinical practices that save lives and improve patient safety. The MacArthur Foundation has selected him as a 2008 Fellow and recipient of a $500,000 "genius grant."
Journal Article > Commentary
Roberts KH, Madsen P, Desai V, Van Stralen D. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:216-220.
This commentary reviews the characteristics of a high-reliability organization (HRO). The authors present the story of a pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary children's hospital to illustrate how HRO processes were adopted. They discuss how the unit evolved into a functioning and safe HRO and how staff reverted to a standard medical model when advocates of the HRO model left the organization. The authors emphasize the importance of constant attention to factors that support an HRO.