Narrow Results Clear All
- Communication Improvement 1
Education and Training
- Students 1
- Error Reporting and Analysis 1
Legal and Policy Approaches
- Quality Improvement Strategies 2
- Technologic Approaches
Search results for "Regulation"
- Electronic Health Records
Freudenheim M. New York Times. December 13, 2010:3B.
This article reports on a committee created by the Institute of Medicine to analyze the potential impact of electronic medical records (EMR) on costs and quality of care.
Perspectives on Safety > Interview
The Business Case for Improving Safety, May 2009
The Business Case for Improving Safety
Levinson DR. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General; December 2008. Report No. OEI-06-07-00470.
The Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 mandated that the Office of Inspector General (OIG) report to Congress the incidence of "never events" among Medicare beneficiaries, payment by Medicare for services in connection with such events, and the process used to identify events and deny payments. This report addresses that mandate by providing a descriptive analysis of the key issues to understanding hospital-based adverse events. The report is focused around discussion of seven critical issues that are explored in detail. Of note, OIG expanded the study of never events to the broader topic of adverse events in their analysis.
Journal Article > Commentary
The adoption of electronic medical record technology in order to prevent medical errors: a matter for American public policy.
Crane JN, Crane FG. Policy Stud. 2008;29:137-143.
This article proposes that public policy and legislation should compel the use of electronic medical records (EMRs) to improve patient safety.
Urbina I, Nixon R. New York Times. March 30, 2007;National Desk section:1.
This article reports on the inconsistent use of the Department of Defense electronic medical records system and how this has led to medical errors and delays in care for US veterans.