Narrow Results Clear All
- Communication Improvement 2
- Culture of Safety 2
- Education and Training 1
- Error Reporting and Analysis
- Human Factors Engineering 1
- Legal and Policy Approaches 7
- Quality Improvement Strategies 9
- Teamwork 1
- Technologic Approaches 3
- Transparency and Accountability 2
- Device-related Complications 2
- Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems 1
- Medical Complications 5
- Medication Safety 4
- Nonsurgical Procedural Complications 1
- Surgical Complications 1
- Australia and New Zealand 1
- Europe 1
- Canada 1
Search results for "Governmental Reporting"
Pino R, Furniss WH, Mueller L, Olson JC. Hartford, CT: Connecticut Department of Public Health; October 2016.
This annual publication provides data on adverse events reported to the Connecticut Department of Public Health. The most recent report discusses an analysis of the 456 incidents submitted in 2015, which represents a slight decrease. The most common adverse events reported were pressure ulcers and fall-related injuries or deaths. Past reports are also available.
Jefferson City, MO: Center for Patient Safety; June 11, 2019.
Patient Safety Organizations (PSOs) provide local evidence to inform learning at the state level. This annual report analyzes trends present in reports submitted to the PSO in 2018. Medication errors, falls, and health care–acquired infections were frequently reported. The material discusses reasons for these events, shares lessons learned, and points to resources to aid organizations in reducing conditions that enable reportable occurrences.
Wright S. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General; July 2012. Report No. OEI-06-09-00092.
This report built on earlier research to examine rates of adverse events reported to state-level reporting systems compared with hospital data. It found that, even in states with required hospital reporting of adverse events, only about one in nine events is reported to the state. Because few of the events were found in each hospital's incident reporting system, the investigators concluded that the low rate of reporting was likely due to hospital failure to identify events rather than hospitals failing to report known events.
Lucado J, Paez K, Elixhauser A. HCUP Statistical Brief #109. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; April 2011.
The Quality Improvement Committee. Wellington, New Zealand.
Considered a starting point for a national reporting initiative, this series of annual reports provides statistics on serious and sentinel events in New Zealand's 21 District Health Boards. The reports aim to encourage transparency in New Zealand medical practice and bolster knowledge to prevent future errors.
The High Costs of Weak Compliance With the New York State Hospital Adverse Event Reporting and Tracking System.
Thompson WC Jr. New York, NY: Office of the New York City Comptroller, Office of Policy Management; 2009.
This report assesses the New York State Department of Health's New York Patient Occurrence and Tracking System (NYPORTS). It observes trends of adverse event reporting, finds that New York City hospitals report dramatically fewer events per discharge, explores reasons for underreporting, and discusses the impact on safety improvement efforts.
Levinson DR. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General; December 2008. Report No. OEI-06-07-00471.
The Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 mandated that the Office of Inspector General (OIG) report to Congress a series of analyses with the first related to understanding the issues around hospital-based adverse events. This related and simultaneously released report identifies and describes state reporting systems and how they utilize the captured information. The report concludes that as of January 2008, 26 states had reporting systems in place, 23 states used the data to hold individual hospitals accountable, and 18 states reported using the data to promote learning and develop prevention strategies. A past AHRQ WebM&M perspective discusses the role of state reporting systems in advancing patient safety.
St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Health; January 2009.
Through a qualitative evaluation of the Minnesota statewide reporting initiative, this report suggests ways to improve the reporting system to facilitate continued learning and transparency.
Health-Care-Associated Infections in Hospitals: An Overview of State Reporting Programs and Individual Hospital Initiatives to Reduce Certain Infections.
Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office; September 2008. Publication GAO-08-808.
This report describes state reporting programs for health care–associated infection (HAI), hospital initiatives to reduce MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), and challenges encountered in HAI reduction.
Office of the Inspector General. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; September 2006. Report No. OEI-09-04-00350.
This report presents findings from an investigation into the reporting of and response to restraint and seclusion-related deaths.
Rosenthal J, Booth M. Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health Policy; 2005.
This report, generated by the National Academy for State Health Policy, provides practical guidance and tools for states with existing reporting systems. The expert group that came together included data collectors, analysts, and users who aimed to develop strategies for improved collection, analysis, and feedback. The authors present key findings and emphasize that the quality improvement aspect of reporting systems is critical to success. Although the authors encourage greater use of reporting systems, a need exists for states to produce better-quality reports from their data to promote patient safety interventions. Additional initiatives from the report include development of a central Web-based repository of tools and resources that they plan to make available at their Web site.
Preventable tragedies: superbugs and how ineffective monitoring of medical device safety fails patients.
US Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. January 13, 2016.
Insufficient sterilization of duodenoscopes and other medical equipment has been linked to health care–associated infection outbreaks. This report summarizes findings from a government investigation into existing methods for monitoring and reporting device problems and provides recommendations for Congress, hospitals, and the Food and Drug Administration to augment identification and prevention of safety issues associated with medical devices.
Fourth Report of Session 2014–15. House of Commons Health Committee. London, England: The Stationery Office; January 13, 2015. Publication HC 350.
Complaints are a proactive way to monitor and address recurring problems that may result in adverse events and system failures. This report discusses progress achieved through complaint response efforts in the United Kingdom and provides recommendations to augment how complaints are managed to develop further improvements.
Levinson DR. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General; January 2015. Report No. OEI-01-13-00400.
A widely-reported meningitis outbreak in the United States uncovered quality and safety issues associated with the use of compounded sterile preparations. This publication describes an analysis of five accreditation organizations and their ability to provide oversight and inspection of Medicare hospitals that contract with compounding entities. The authors offer recommendations to help hospitals determine if their compounded sterile preparations contracts ensure products are prepared safely for use, including targeted training for surveyors related to compounding and improved contracting processes.
Healthcare Inspection: Evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration's National Consult Delay Review and Associated Fact Sheet.
Daigh JD Jr. Washington, DC: VA Office of the Inspector General; December 15, 2014. Report No. 14-04705-62.
Misrepresentation of findings, either by accident or design, can result in ineffective use of resources and poor decision-making. This investigation found inconsistencies in the information reported by the Veterans Health Administration in the widely-publicized analysis discussing weaknesses in the organization that resulted in delayed care. The author calls for the assessment to be revisited to ensure conclusions and work toward improvement are verifiable to augment the safety and timeliness of care provided to veterans.
Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information; January 23, 2014.
This report compared the quality of care in Canada with 34 other countries to identify areas in which it performed well and where it needed improvement. The country has strong measures of community care such as avoidable admissions and influenza vaccinations, but is behind in efforts to reduce patient safety incidents, including trauma in obstetric care and retained foreign objects.
Washington DC: National Quality Forum; 2010.
The landmark Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, To Err Is Human, called for states to publicly report never events—medical errors that resulted in death or severe disability. This National Quality Forum publication evaluates the current status of state reporting systems 10 years after the IOM report, and summarizes the strengths and limitations of current public reporting initiatives. To date, 28 states maintain some type of reporting system, primarily tracking never events and health care–associated infections. However, states vary significantly in their implementation of these systems, requirements for reporting errors, and regulations regarding analysis and follow-up of errors, limiting the effect of reporting systems on improving patient safety. An AHRQ WebM&M perspective discusses the challenges and opportunities faced by current state reporting systems.
Salt Lake City, UT: Utah Department of Health, Utah Hospitals & Health Systems Association, and HealthInsight; March 10, 2010.
This brief provides information on 101 sentinel events reported to the state of Utah in 2009. The report also includes background on efforts to address such incidents.
Opportunities and Recommendations for State–Federal Coordination to Improve Health System Performance: A Focus on Patient Safety.
Buxbaum J. Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health Policy; January 2010.
This briefing summarizes recommendations from a roundtable of health policy leaders, who selected the following areas as foci for initial federal–state coordination of safety efforts: reducing health care–associated infections, decreasing preventable hospital readmissions, and minimizing hospitalization for ambulatory conditions.
Wright S. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General; January 5, 2010. Report No. OEI-06-09-00360.