Narrow Results Clear All
Resource Type
- Patient Safety Primers 8
- WebM&M Cases 202
-
Perspectives on Safety
191
- Interview 98
- Perspective 83
-
Journal Article
6509
- Commentary 1643
- Review 743
- Study 4122
-
Audiovisual
102
- Image/Poster 11
- Slideset 13
- Book/Report 406
- Legislation/Regulation 49
- Newspaper/Magazine Article 561
- Newsletter/Journal 15
- Special or Theme Issue 139
-
Tools/Toolkit
72
- Glossary 1
- Toolkit 36
-
Web Resource
522
- Forum 1
- Award 24
- Bibliography 3
- Biography 1
- Grant 7
- Meeting/Conference 44
- Press Release/Announcement 33
Approach to Improving Safety
-
Communication Improvement
1727
-
Communication between Providers
1142
- Sbar 30
-
Communication between Providers
1142
-
Culture of Safety
1182
- Just Culture 40
-
Education and Training
1514
- Simulators 216
- Students 102
-
Error Reporting and Analysis
2903
- Error Analysis 1228
-
Error Reporting
1113
- Never Events 78
-
Human Factors Engineering
1113
- Checklists 325
-
Legal and Policy Approaches
838
-
Incentives
208
- Financial 97
- Regulation 155
-
Incentives
208
- Logistical Approaches 547
- Policies and Operations 1
-
Quality Improvement Strategies
2149
- Benchmarking 199
- Reminders 50
- Six Sigma 17
-
Specialization of Care
460
- Hospitalists 21
- Teamwork 618
-
Technologic Approaches
1406
- Telemedicine 32
- Transparency and Accountability 2
Safety Target
- Alert fatigue 31
- Device-related Complications 340
- Diagnostic Errors 422
- Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems 893
- Drug shortages 25
- Failure to rescue 16
- Fatigue and Sleep Deprivation 214
- Identification Errors 189
- Inpatient suicide 13
- Interruptions and distractions 121
-
Medical Complications
841
- Delirium 8
- Patient Falls 107
- Medication Safety 2145
- MRI safety 7
-
Nonsurgical Procedural Complications
173
- Cardiology 11
- Psychological and Social Complications 474
- Second victims 33
- Surgical Complications 935
- Transfusion Complications 33
Setting of Care
-
Ambulatory Care
682
- Home Care 56
-
Hospitals
6022
-
General Hospitals
2053
- Operating Room 790
-
General Hospitals
2053
- Long-Term Care 151
- Outpatient Surgery 67
- Patient Transport 58
- Psychiatric Facilities 38
Clinical Area
- Allied Health Services 32
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine 1
- Dentistry 7
-
Medicine
6334
- Anesthesiology 233
- Critical Care 562
- Dermatology 17
- Family Medicine 155
- Gynecology 140
- Hospital Medicine 1692
-
Internal Medicine
2306
- Cardiology 104
- Geriatrics 204
- Hematology 38
- Medical Oncology 180
- Nephrology 28
- Pulmonology 19
- Neurology 34
- Obstetrics 166
- Pediatrics 513
- Primary Care 237
- Radiology 133
-
Surgery
956
- Neurosurgery 22
- Urology 13
-
Nursing
925
- Home Nursing 23
- Palliative Care 7
- Pharmacy 640
Target Audience
- Family Members and Caregivers 62
-
Health Care Executives and Administrators
- Nurse Managers 942
- Risk Managers 1119
-
Health Care Providers
5257
- Nurses 1122
- Pharmacists 353
- Physicians 1135
-
Non-Health Care Professionals
3653
- Educators 732
- Engineers 225
- Media 29
- Policy Makers 701
- Patients 322
Origin/Sponsor
- Africa 21
-
Asia
144
- China 22
- Australia and New Zealand 364
- Central and South America 15
-
Europe
1607
- The Netherlands 182
- United Kingdom 918
-
North America
6352
- Canada 390
Search results for "Health Care Executives and Administrators"
- Health Care Executives and Administrators
Download Citation File:
- View: Basic | Expanded
- Sort: Best Match | Most Recent
Audiovisual > Audiovisual Presentation
The Toolkit for Using the AHRQ Quality Indicators: How To Improve Hospital Quality and Safety.
Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; July 2016.
This toolkit provides resources to help hospitals to augment safety. The updated toolkit represents adjustments made to the AHRQ Quality Indicators to support the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10, experience from testing in hospitals, and materials targeted to inform leadership of the program. The toolkit is structured around enhancing multidisciplinary teamwork by completing a series of steps such as assessing the organizational readiness for a change initiative, implementing improvements, and determining the return on investment of the programs.
Tools/Toolkit > Measurement Tool/Indicator
High Reliability in Health Care.
Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare.
Development of high reliability remains an elusive goal for health care organizations. The Joint Commission has also advocated for achieving high reliability in health care. This website collects evidence and existing tools to help organizations work toward high reliability, including the ORO 2.0 assessment tool to enable hospital leaders evaluate their culture, leadership, and performance.
Journal Article > Study
Ambulatory computerized prescribing and preventable adverse drug events.
Overhage JM, Gandhi TK, Hope C, et al. J Patient Saf. 2016;12:69-74.
Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a common source of patient harm in the ambulatory setting. A substantial proportion of ADEs are caused by preventable errors in medication prescribing or monitoring. The introduction of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) has been shown to reduce the rate of medical errors in the inpatient setting. This before–after study examined rates of ADEs in primary care practices that implemented a CPOE system in Boston and Indianapolis. At baseline, the potential ADE rate was more than seven-fold greater in Indianapolis compared to Boston. Following CPOE implementation, this rate decreased by 56% in Indianapolis but increased by 104% in Boston, and there was no change overall in preventable ADEs. A recent PSNet annual perspective reviewed the relationship and current evidence linking CPOE and patient safety.
Journal Article > Study
An observational study to evaluate the usability and intent to adopt an artificial intelligence–powered medication reconciliation tool.
Long J, Yuan MJ, Poonawala R. Interact J Med Res. 2016;5:e14.
This study describes the development of a tablet-based program that includes artificial intelligence elements for guiding patients through medication reconciliation. The researchers observed 10 patients using the tool and collected survey feedback on its usability and value from a small number of physicians, nurses, and patients.
Book/Report
Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture: 2016 User Comparative Database Report.
Famolaro T, Yount ND, Hare R, Thornton S, Sorra J. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; May 2016. AHRQ Publication No. 16-0028-EF.
For more than a decade, the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture has been used in hospitals to evaluate aspects of local organizational culture that affect patient safety. Improved patient safety culture scores have been associated with reduced adverse events and better patient outcomes. The Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture expands this widely used tool for application in the medical office setting. The 2016 User Comparative Database includes data from more than 25,000 respondents across 1,528 medical offices that completed the survey between 2013 and 2015. As with similar databases for hospitals and pharmacies, this resource serves as a tool for benchmarking performance and identifying potential areas for improvement. Teamwork and patient care tracking received the strongest positive scores, whereas work pressure and pace was identified as the area with the most potential for improvement. A prior PSNet perspective discussed establishing a safety culture.
Journal Article > Commentary
Why July matters.
Petrilli CM, Del Valle J, Chopra V. Acad Med. 2016;91:910–912.
Studies have reached conflicting conclusions about whether the "July Effect"—the belief that inpatient mortality increases during the July transition—truly exists. This commentary describes how leadership, supervision, mentor–learner pairings, and communication enhancement can help to reduce risks in this period. The authors suggest that applying strategies from aviation to augment teamwork between interns and residents could be an effective improvement strategy.
Journal Article > Commentary
Toward a safer health care system: the critical need to improve measurement.
- Classic
Jha A, Pronovost PJ. JAMA. 2016;315:1831-1832.
In this call for better measurement and reporting, two patient safety experts lay out steps that federal policymakers can take to advance patient safety. The commentary emphasizes the need for valid patient safety measures and mentions the Surgeon Scorecard as an example of journalists and private companies stepping in to provide needed transparency. The authors suggest that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) focus on measures of the most common causes of iatrogenic harm to hospitalized patients, including adverse drug events, hospital-acquired conditions, and surgical complications. They recommend that CMS remove current metrics that rely on administrative data due to concerns about validity and accuracy of these measures. The commentary advocates for tasking an official agency with defining measurement standards and benchmarks. The authors also propose that Congress fund research on systems engineering. A recent PSNet interview discussed AHRQ's efforts to develop patient safety measures and improvement programs.
Journal Article > Review
From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.
Ocloo J, Matthews R. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:626-632.
Patient participation is considered a key component of patient safety initiatives. This review examined patient engagement programs and policies and determined that the current methods do not result in true public involvement in safety improvement. The authors suggest broader strategies are needed to engage the public in co-designing a safer health care system.
Journal Article > Study
Can medical record reviewers reliably identify errors and adverse events in the ED?
Klasco RS, Wolfe RE, Lee T, et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34:1043-1048.
Classic studies of the epidemiology of adverse events in hospitalized patients have identified safety issues using retrospective chart review combined with trigger tools. This study examined this methodology to detect adverse events in emergency department patients and found good agreement between independent clinical reviewers regarding the presence of errors and adverse events.
Journal Article > Commentary
Patient safety and the problem of many hands.
Dixon-Woods M, Pronovost PJ. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:485-488.
Although individual and organizational accountability are important elements of safety, they can also hinder system-wide improvement. This commentary discusses challenges to coordinating actions and accountability among and throughout the various components in health care, such as hospitals, governmental agencies, insurers, and accreditors. To achieve improvements, the authors propose that health care needs to establish a collective responsibility to develop collaborative solutions that balance global standards with local interventions.
Journal Article > Study
Completeness of serious adverse drug event reports received by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2014.
Moore TJ, Furberg CD, Mattison DR, Cohen MR. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25:713-718.
According to this study, many adverse drug event reports submitted by drug manufacturers to the Food and Drug Administration were incomplete. The authors advocate for the FDA to update their reporting requirements and compliance policies.
Journal Article > Commentary
Speak up! Addressing the paradox plaguing patient-centered care.
Mazor KM, Smith KM, Fisher KA, Gallagher TH. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:618-619.
Although patients have been increasingly encouraged to speak up about concerns as a way to improve safety, health care institutions often have no system in place to ensure such concerns are promptly addressed. This commentary explores the disconnect between intention and action and suggests steps to be taken so that health systems can achieve benefits of patient engagement initiatives.
Journal Article > Study
A comparative effectiveness analysis of the implementation of surgical safety checklists in a tertiary care hospital.
Bock M, Doz P, Fanolla A, et al. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:639-644.
The surgical safety checklist has generally been evaluated based on outcomes that occur within 30 days of the primary operation. For instance, the initial studies by the World Health Organization showed remarkable improvements in mortality and morbidity within 30 days, while a more recent retrospective study following mandated implementation of the checklist throughout Ontario failed to show any enhanced safety outcomes over this same interval. This current study evaluated the introduction of a surgical safety checklist at a single academic Italian hospital, measuring 90-day all-cause mortality, length of stay, and 30-day readmission rates, in addition to 30-day mortality rates. The study included approximately 10,000 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, with about half in the preintervention and postintervention groups. Following checklist implementation, 90-day mortality significantly decreased, 30-day all-cause mortality was unchanged, and adjusted length of stay dropped from 10.4 to 9.6 days; no difference was found in readmission rates. A recent PSNet interview with Dr. Lucian Leape explored the conflicting findings of the efficacy of surgical safety checklists.
Journal Article > Study
Crew resource management training in the intensive care unit. A multisite controlled before-after study.
Kemper PF, de Bruijne M, van Dyck C, So RL, Tangkau P, Wagner C. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:577-587.
This study found that classroom-based crew resource management training for intensive care unit staff was well received and improved self-reported situational awareness tactics, safety culture, and job satisfaction. However, there were no measurable changes in professional communication or patient outcomes compared to control groups.
Journal Article > Study
Characteristics of morbidity and mortality conferences associated with the implementation of patient safety improvement initiatives, an observational study.
François P, Prate F, Vidal-Trecan G, Quaranta JF, Labarere J, Sellier E. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:35.
Morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences are a classic patient safety education and feedback strategy. This study found that elements of M&M conferences, including thorough investigation of failures, predicted whether an improvement initiative was implemented. This work suggests that M&M conferences can be optimally designed to foster subsequent improvement efforts.
Journal Article > Commentary
An ethical framework for allocating scarce life-saving chemotherapy and supportive care drugs for childhood cancer.
Unguru Y, Fernandez CV, Bernhardt B, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108:djv392.
Drug shortages have become increasingly common in recent years, especially in the United States. Some pediatric chemotherapeutics have frequently been in short supply, posing serious risks to patient safety. This commentary describes an ethical framework developed by a multidisciplinary group of experts and a panel of peer consultants. The framework seeks to guide clinicians' decision-making around allocating life-saving chemotherapies and associated drugs for children with cancer. The authors describe methods for managing shortages by reducing waste. The guideline also provides clear reasoning for actual prioritization across and within common pediatric cancers during a drug shortage. For example, in cases where shortages lead to the inability to provide the standard of care for some children, the authors propose emphasizing curability and prognosis in determining who is likely to have the most benefit. In 2013, the FDA released a strategic plan for preventing drug shortages, but the problem has continued largely unabated.
Journal Article > Review
Managing and mitigating conflict in healthcare teams: an integrative review.
Almost J, Wolff AC, Stewart-Pyne A, McCormick LG, Strachan D, D'Souza C. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72:1490-1505.
This narrative review found that factors associated with personality, attitudes, role ambiguity, and work environment all contribute to interpersonal conflict in health care settings. The authors describe possible interventions to reduce conflict, which should in turn improve patient safety.
Journal Article > Study
Is single room hospital accommodation associated with differences in healthcare-associated infection, falls, pressure ulcers or medication errors? A natural experiment with non-equivalent controls.
Simon M, Maben J, Murrells T, Griffiths P. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016;21:147-155.
This study expands on analyses and conclusions from published findings exploring the effects of moving to a new hospital with 100% single room accommodations. The researchers used nonequivalent controls by comparing results to a hospital that had not changed buildings but planned to do so (steady state control) and a hospital that moved to a new building with fewer than 50% single rooms (new build control). Falls, pressure ulcers, and Clostridium difficile infections increased in the older patients' ward after the move to single rooms. However, there was also a significant change in the case mix on this ward following the move, which may have explained these changes in adverse events. On the acute assessment unit, falls and medication errors temporarily increased for the first 6 months but then returned to prior rates. The authors found neither clear evidence of benefit nor increased risk of harm attributable to moving to all single room accommodations.
Journal Article > Commentary
Rating the raters: the inconsistent quality of health care performance measurement.
Shahian DM, Normand ST, Friedberg MW, Hutter MM, Pronovost PJ. Ann Surg. 2016;264:36-38.
Public ratings of hospital quality and safety data may not always provide the best information for patients and clinicians. This commentary discusses problems with the existing set of patient safety metrics and suggests that measurement approaches need to be improved to enhance transparency and decision making.
Journal Article > Review
How safe is primary care? A systematic review.
- Classic
Panesar SS, deSilva D, Carson-Stevens A, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:544-553.
Patient safety in ambulatory care settings has received less attention than in the hospital setting, where the patient safety movement originated. This systematic review commissioned by the World Health Organization examined patient safety incidents in primary care. Estimates diverged widely between studies, and most patient safety incidents did not lead to harm. However, the types of incidents most likely to cause harm were missed and delayed diagnoses and medication prescribing problems. The accompanying editorial highlights the need to implement consistent and clear definitions for patient safety incidents and associated harm and advocates for investment in research and improvement efforts for patient safety in primary care.
