Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Practice Guidelines
Displaying 1 - 10 of 777

Summary

North American Partners in Anesthesia (NAPA) is a nationwide anesthesia practice with more than 450 facilities in 21 states. NAPA employs anesthesiologists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and certified anesthesiologist assistants. The Anesthesia Risk Alert program is a protocol created as a work product by NAPA’s component Patient Safety Organization, the NAPA Anesthesia Patient Safety Institute (NAPSI), which monitors patients for specific high-risk clinical factors and trains providers to apply targeted mitigation interventions when patients are considered at risk.1 The interventions are based on well-researched practices and clinical guidelines and were informed by an analysis of three years of adverse event data across NAPA by NAPSI, referred to throughout as the innovator. This data analysis revealed five high-risk clinical scenarios. The NAPSI team created a detailed program for providers to respond to each of the five scenarios.

Innovation Patient Safety Focus

The innovation was developed from an initial quality improvement project and was piloted among New York NAPA hospitals.1 The pilot started as a precautionary practice of noticing high-risk clinical scenarios prior to patients undergoing a procedure wherein clinicians respond with a specific risk mitigation strategy. This proactive approach permits clinicians to focus on specific patient risk factors and respond with the best intervention to prevent potential adverse events.

Evidence Rating

Resources Used and Skills Needed

  • Coordinator to orchestrate and implement the innovation across providers.
  • Dashboards to drive conversations in monthly quality meetings.
  • Data-driven talking points shared at monthly quality meetings.
  • Data dissemination methods via texts and emails to providers to encourage ongoing documentation and increases in compliance.
  • Monthly staff meetings conducted by leaders with providers to discuss compliance strengths and gaps, and to give data-driven feedback.
  • Data analysis of adverse events.
    • Investing resources into strong data collection and data analytics supported the NAPSI team’s ability to identify their five high-risk clinical scenarios to decrease adverse events.
  • Expertise to perform data analytics and to design information technology dashboards (to track compliance and adverse events in Microsoft Power Business Intelligence).
  • Clear documentation of adverse events in a NAPSI quality reporting platform.
  • Compliance tracking of patient screenings for the five high-risk scenarios. When a positive screen occurs, documentation of whether or not the mitigation strategy was applied.
  • Leadership to manage implementation and ongoing feedback to providers.

Use By Other Organizations

Currently, NAPSI’s Anesthesia Risk Alert program is being used across NAPA’s nationwide practices including 450 facilities (hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, and office-based health care providers) among 6,000 anesthesiologists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and certified anesthesiologist assistants in 21 states. No other organizations use the Anesthesia Risk Alert program.

Developing Organizations

Date First Implemented

2019
When Vomit Gets in the Way: Aspiration Resulting in Death During Endoscopy
Timothy Do, BS and Fiona J Scott, MD, MPH, MS, MHI,  

A 32-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) under monitored anesthesia care (MAC). As the endoscope was advanced into the stomach, the patient vomited. She was immediately turned supine but copious vomitus obstructed the suction catheter. The patient started to decompensate with decreasing oxygen saturation. The anesthesia team attempted to secure the airway by endotracheal intubation but was unable to place a tube due to poor view and vomitus. The patient went into cardiac arrest and ultimately passed away. The commentary discusses safety considerations for ERCP under MAC, weighing the risks and benefits of MAC versus general anesthesia, and airway management during emergencies.

Subscribe to Practice Guidelines