Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study

Comparison of a voluntary safety reporting system to a global trigger tool for identifying adverse events in an oncology population.

Samal L, Khasnabish S, Foskett C, et al. Comparison of a voluntary safety reporting system to a global trigger tool for identifying adverse events in an oncology population. J Patient Saf. Epub 2022 Jul 21, doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000001050

Save
Print
August 3, 2022
Samal L, Khasnabish S, Foskett C, et al. J Patient Saf. 2022;18(6):611-616.
View more articles from the same authors.

Adverse events can be identified through multiple methods, including trigger tools and voluntary reporting systems. In this comparison study, the Global Trigger Tool identified 79 AE in 88 oncology patients, compared to 21 in the voluntary reporting system; only two AE were identified by both. Results indicate multiple sources should be used to detect AE.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Samal L, Khasnabish S, Foskett C, et al. Comparison of a voluntary safety reporting system to a global trigger tool for identifying adverse events in an oncology population. J Patient Saf. Epub 2022 Jul 21, doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000001050

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)
Related Resources