Skip to main content
Commentary
Classic

The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors—could it do harm?

Brennan TA. The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors--could it do harm?. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(15):1123-1125. doi:10.1056/NEJM200004133421510

Save
Print
March 27, 2005
Brennan TA. N Engl J Med. 2002;342(15):1123-1125.

In this article, Brennan describes how the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report To Err is Human may, in fact, be harmful. The author offers an important perspective, as he was an investigator in two of the studies used to draw conclusions in the report. He expresses concerns about the extrapolation of these data and suggests that the figures from the IOM are inflated. He argues that these data can also be used to infer that medical care in hospitals has, in fact, become safer, despite the media’s interpretation of this report. He also notes the discordance between the demand for systematic approaches to injury prevention and the unwillingness of patients or politicians to pay for the expense of such interventions. He expresses concerns regarding the demand for public reporting of medical errors that has resulted from this report and the difficulty of pursuing such a system in the current medical legal environment.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Brennan TA. The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors--could it do harm?. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(15):1123-1125. doi:10.1056/NEJM200004133421510

Related Resources
See More About