WebM&M: Case Studies
WebM&M (Morbidity & Mortality Rounds on the Web) features expert analysis of medical errors reported anonymously by our readers. Spotlight Cases include interactive learning modules available for CME. Commentaries are written by patient safety experts and published monthly.
Have you encountered medical errors or patient safety issues? Submit your case below to help the medical community and to prevent similar errors in the future.
This Month's WebM&Ms
A man presented at the emergency department (ED) after a motorcycle crash. He had superficial lacerations... Read More
An 8-year-old boy undergoing a neck mass aspiration experienced a sudden drop in oxygen saturation and heart rate, requiring CPR and intubation, due to... Read More
All WebM&M: Case Studies (659)
A man presented at the emergency department (ED) after a motorcycle crash. He had superficial lacerations on his left elbow, where wood chips were noted on exam and x-ray but were not fully removed before discharge. He was discharged with antibiotic prescriptions, but returned three days later with worsening symptoms, including pain, swelling, and pus, leading to additional foreign material being removed and further antibiotic treatment, but without repeat x-rays. Ultimately, he developed osteomyelitis, requiring multiple surgeries and a long hospital stay due to the retained foreign bodies. The commentary highlights the importance of evaluating patient risk of wound infection and poor wound healing, the role of imaging modalities to help identify foreign material in wounds, and diligent follow-up to prevent complications.
An 8-year-old boy undergoing a neck mass aspiration experienced a sudden drop in oxygen saturation and heart rate, requiring CPR and intubation, due to being administered nitrous oxide instead of oxygen following a maintenance error by an inadequately trained employee. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) on a ventilator but remained unresponsive and died. The commentary discusses several approaches to improving patient safety during anesthesia administration in the surgical suite, such as use of oxygen analyzers and considering hypoxic gas mixture as the cause for sudden deterioration.
A 54-year-old man with a history of tobacco use presented to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain. He was initially stable upon arrival, though with signs of fluid overload and electrolyte abnormalities including hyponatremia and hyperkalemia. Despite treatment including heparin, amiodarone, and metoprolol for atrial fibrillation, and interventions for hyperkalemia, the patient deteriorated rapidly into cardiac arrest characterized by Torsades de pointes, which was mistaken for ventricular fibrillation. Despite resuscitative efforts, he did not achieve return of spontaneous circulation and autopsy revealed sudden cardiac arrest without myocardial infarction as the cause of death. The commentary highlights how the misinterpretation of a common laboratory complication can lead to incorrect treatment and patient harm.
A woman underwent surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome without complications and was discharged with instructions to avoid soaking her hand in water (to reduce infection risk) and return for suture removal in 10 days. Despite reporting symptoms such as warmth, redness, and pain in her wrist shortly after surgery, her concerns were not adequately addressed by the surgeon's office. The patient returned for suture removal and visit notes stated that the wound was not infected or swollen. However, the patient continued to report pain, swelling, redness and oozing at the incision site after suture removal. Two weeks later, she presented to the emergency department (ED) and diagnosed with a severe infection, leading to multiple hospitalizations and permanent impairment of her right hand. The commentary discusses the importance of preoperative discussions about post-operative care, including sterile practices, and the use of protocol-based management strategies for medical office personnel to ensure that patient interactions and communication are appropriately documented and acted upon
An adolescent with type 1 diabetes presented to the emergency department (ED) with dizziness, fatigue, and a “high” reading on her home blood glucose monitor. She was diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) likely due to insulin pump malfunction. Despite initial treatment, her condition did not improve as expected. Later, it was discovered that an incorrect weight was used to calculate her insulin drip rate, based on a guessed weight provided by the patient upon admission. Once her actual weight was used to adjust treatment, her DKA resolved rapidly within 12 hours. The commentary discusses how human factors engineering and electronic health record (EHR) functionalities can optimize weight measurement during patient encounters and the role of clinical pharmacists in the ED to improve medication safety.
During elective rhinoplasty, a patient became aware that she was awake. She heard the conversation among the surgical team members and felt that the breathing tube was pushed up against the inside of her throat, impeding her ability to breathe. She was unable to move but recalls making a “monumental effort” to utter a small groaning noise, which alerted the surgeon to the fact that she was awake. She heard the surgeon verbally acknowledge her condition and offer reassurance that the operation was almost over. During the first follow-up visit, the surgeon did not address the situation, so the patient brought it up at the end of the visit. The surgeon seemed surprised and embarrassed that the patient remembered waking up during the operation but could not explain what happened. The commentary discusses the risk factors for intraoperative awareness, approaches to prevent awareness, and the importance of validating and addressing the patient’s experience, including addressing symptoms of post-traumatic stress syndrome.
A 55-year-old woman with a history of panic attacks, obesity, and untreated hypertension, experienced syncope after feeling flushed and lightheaded. On arrival at the emergency department, she had severely elevated blood pressure and hypoxemia. Diagnostic tests revealed acute heart failure exacerbation with pulmonary edema, marked elevation of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and elevated troponin-I. Despite treatment with diuretics and antihypertensives, her condition deteriorated, leading to intubation due to respiratory failure and subsequent cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation resulted in with return of spontaneous circulation. However, she suffered from ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhages, ultimately leading to a transition to comfort care and subsequent death. The commentary discusses the contraindications for beta-blockers in the setting of acute decompensated heart failure and appropriate treatment for hypertensive emergencies in the emergency department and intensive care unit.
A 19-month-old boy was being transferred to a tertiary medical center from another emergency department after undergoing comprehensive resuscitation efforts due to cardiopulmonary arrest. The transport clinician intended to administer rocuronium (a neuromuscular blocking agent) to treat ventilator desynchrony, but instead unintentionally administered flumazenil (a benzodiazepine antagonist). The clinician promptly corrected the error by administering the appropriate dose of rocuronium. The commentary highlights the importance of “double checks” during medication administration and how both technologic approaches and human factors engineering principles can support safe medication administration practices.
A 67-year-old man with severe low back pain was admitted to the hospital for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with bone autograft from the iliac crest. The surgical team had difficulty controlling bleeding and the patient left the operating room (OR) with the bone graft donor site open and oozing blood. In the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), the nurse called the attending physician three times to report hypotension and ongoing bleeding. Each time, the surgeon ordered hetastarch for volume expansion. Over the next 14 hours, the patient’s blood pressure remained at or below 90/60 with continued complaints of back and pelvic pain. The next morning, the patient was unresponsive and in severe hypovolemic shock. Electrocardiography confirmed a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The patient was transferred to an intensive care unit and resuscitative efforts were initiated, but the patient expired from multiorgan failure resulting from hypovolemic shock. The commentary discusses appropriate management of ongoing intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and how a culture of safety can enable care team members to voice concerns about patient safety.
A 36-year-old woman with class 2 obesity underwent a difficult laparoscopic hysterectomy, performed in the lithotomy position with a steep head down (Trendelenburg) position. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices were placed on both calves to prevent venous thrombosis (DVT), but on awakening from general anesthesia, the patient complained of severe pain in the right leg. The gynecologist made a presumptive diagnosis of DVT and put her on subcutaneous dalteparin at therapeutic dosing and acetaminophen and oral morphine for pain relief. The patient continued to complain of severe pain and paresthesias in her right calf and doppler ultrasound scan was negative for DVT. The next day the orthopedic on-call team was consulted and diagnosed compartment syndrome of the right leg. The patient required fasciectomy of the right leg and excision of necrotic muscle tissue, with a prolonged hospital stay. The commentary discusses how patient positioning during surgery can increase the risk for surgical complications, the role of interdisciplinary teamwork to achieve optimal positioning, and the importance of early identification of compartment syndrome to prevent permanent injury.
Five weeks after gastric bypass surgery, a woman experienced persistent nausea and vomiting, leading to dehydration and multiple outpatient treatments. Despite visiting an outpatient clinic and emergency department (ED) for ongoing symptoms and significant weight loss, the nausea and vomiting persisted. Eventually, she was admitted to the ICU with pancreatitis and dehydration. Subsequently, she exhibited neurological symptoms including difficulty walking, tingling sensations, and cognitive impairment. She was discharged with orders for total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Three days after discharge, she was readmitted for worsening confusion and profound motor weakness, which progressed to respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Laboratory tests revealed an extremely low thiamine level, and the patient was diagnosed with advanced Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome, exacerbated by a lack of proper nutrition, and resulting in permanent brain damage, necessitating ongoing care. The commentary discusses how biases associated with medical conditions, such as obesity and its treatment, can lead to poorer outcomes, as well as strategies to continually re-evaluate diagnostic reasoning in light of ongoing, intensive management and management reasoning
A 55-year-old man with a history of osteoarthritis and supraventricular tachycardia was admitted the hospital with severe COVID-19 and required endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation. Following transfer to a long-term care hospital (LTCH) for continued weaning from mechanical ventilation, inadequate tracheostomy management protocols were evident, with no specific instructions provided. Subsequently, the patient experienced respiratory distress and cardiac arrest due to a blocked tracheostomy tube, highlighting critical deficiencies in care and communication. The commentary summarizes the risk factors for tracheostomy complications, the importance of tracheostomy tube maintenance and monitoring, and strategies to safeguard tracheostomy tube care during transitions of care.
A man in his 70s with a past medical history of lymphoma in remission, obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea, and supraventricular tachycardia presented to the emergency department (ED) after two weeks of nightly chest pain episodes. His primary care physician had ordered laboratory testing, which was unremarkable other than a slightly elevated D-dimer (which was normal when adjusted for age). His physical examination and laboratory tests in the ED were normal and he had a record of normal stress testing from two years prior. The patient was discharged from the ED the same day but passed away at home two days later due to severe coronary artery disease. The commentary discusses the varied presentation of unstable angina, use of appropriate evaluation and risk stratification, as well as organizational strategies to facilitate thorough patient evaluation across multiple providers, such as standardized patient handoff methods.
A 57-year-old man was rushed to the Emergency Department from a nursing facility, struggling to breathe. With a history of hypertension, diabetes, and heart failure, his vital signs were concerning, showing high blood pressure, rapid heart rate, and low oxygen levels. Examinations revealed fluid buildup in his lungs and legs, indicating severe heart and kidney problems. Despite attempts to remove excess fluid with medication, dialysis became necessary. However, a complication arose during catheter insertion, requiring emergency surgery to retrieve a misplaced guidewire.
A 77-year-old man was admitted for coronary artery bypass graft surgery with aortic valve replacement. The operation went smoothly but the patient went into atrial fibrillation with hypotension during removal of the venous cannula. The patient was shocked at 10 Joules but did not convert to sinus rhythm; the surgeon requested 20 Joules synchronized cardioversion, after which the patient went into ventricular fibrillation and was immediately and successfully defibrillated with 20 Joules. While the patient was being transferred to his gurney, the operating room team noticed that the electrocardiogram cable that enables synchronized cardioversion was only connected into the anesthesia monitor and was never connected to the patient’s defibrillator. The commentary discusses the risks of unsynchronized shocks or pacing, the role of standardized processes to ensure that operating room equipment is prepared and set-up correctly, and the importance of operating room team preparation to urgently address life threatening complications
An elderly patient residing in a group care home, requiring assistance with all activities and having a history of autism-spectrum disorder, experiences fecal leakage issues despite daily medication. During a weekend shift with reduced staffing, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) discovers the patient soiled in bed, necessitating a shower. While attempting to assist the patient, another bowel accident occurs, leading to a fall and head injury when the CNA calls for help. With limited staff available, the patient is eventually taken to the hospital for suturing and further evaluation, where it's determined she requires a higher level of care due to hazardous conditions in the bathroom. The commentary discusses the challenges in providing adequate care in group home settings, especially during weekends with reduced staffing levels.
A 26-year-old man presented to the emergency department (ED) with abdominal pain, displaying tachycardia and extreme agitation. Despite negative findings on physical examination and laboratory tests, his aggressive behavior escalated, necessitating physical and chemical restraint for the safety of both himself and ED staff. The ED physician verbally ordered 10 mg of intramuscular haloperidol, but the primary nurse overrode the automated dispensing unit and mistakenly pulled a vial of midazolam 10 mg instead of haloperidol. Flumazenil was subsequently administered to reverse benzodiazepine toxicity, and the patient recovered without further complications. The commentary discusses best practices to promote safe medication administration in the context of verbal orders and medication overrides.
This pair of cases highlight the immediate and long-term consequences of delayed recognition of compartment syndrome, despite patients presenting with symptoms such as severe pain, numbness, and swelling in the affected limbs. The commentary discusses the importance of a multifactor assessment when compartment syndrome is suspected, effective processes for trainees and non-physician staff to escalate concerns to attending physicians when compartment syndrome is suspected, and improving post-discharge follow-up practices to identify patients requiring further evaluation.
An 82-year-old woman presented to the emergency department for evaluation of “altered mental status” after falling down 5 step-stairs at home. She had a Glasgow Coma Score of 11 (indicating decreased alertness) on arrival. Computed tomography (CT) of the head revealed a right thalamic hemorrhage. She was admitted to the Vascular Neurology service. Overnight, the patient developed atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rate (RVR), which required medications for rate control. The patient failed her swallow evaluation by speech therapy; therefore, a nasogastric (NG) tube was inserted through her right nostril, without difficulty or complications, to administer oral medications. A chest radiograph was obtained to verify placement, but the resident physician did not review the images. During nursing shift change, the incoming nurse was told that the NG tube was ready for use. A tablet of metoprolol 25 mg was crushed by the nurse, mixed with water, and administered through the NG tube. A few minutes after administration, the patient was found to be somnolent and hypoxemic, with oxygen saturation around 80%, requiring supplemental oxygen via non-rebreather mask. Chest radiography showed that the NG tube was in the right lung. The commentary underscores the importance of confirming proper placement of NG tubes before administering feedings, fluids or medications and strategies to reduce the risk of tube placement errors.
A 61-year-old patient presented to the emergency department (ED) complaining of weakness with findings of shuffling gait, slurred speech, delayed response to questions, and inability to concentrate or make eye contact. A stroke alert was activated and a neurosurgeon evaluated the patient via teleconsult. There was no intracranial hemorrhage identified on non-contrast computed tomography (CT) of the head and the neurosurgeon recommended administering Tenecteplase (TNKase). Thirty minutes after TNKase administration, laboratory tests showed that the patient’s alcohol level was 433 mg/dL, a potentially fatal level. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for close monitoring. A repeat CT scan was performed and revealed a new subdural hemorrhage. The neurosurgeon was updated, conservative treatment was recommended, and the patient recovered slowly. The commentary highlights how “stroke chameleons,” “stroke mimics,” and biases contribute to stroke misdiagnosis and strategies to identify “stroke mimics” and improve stroke diagnosis.