Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Commentary

The good, the bad and the ugly: what do we really do when we identify the best and the worst organisations?.

Abel GA, Agniel D, Elliott MN. The good, the bad and the ugly: what do we really do when we identify the best and the worst organisations? BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;34(1):53-61. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2023-017039.

Save
Print Download PDF
January 8, 2025
Abel GA, Agniel D, Elliott MN. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;34(1):53-61.
View more articles from the same authors.

Governments and organizations frequently identify high- and low-performing healthcare organizations for public reporting, quality improvement, or payment. This article highlights the pitfalls of the most common statistical methods used to identify high and low performers and asserts that reliable data is required to minimize incorrect categorization.

Save
Print Download PDF
Cite
Citation

Abel GA, Agniel D, Elliott MN. The good, the bad and the ugly: what do we really do when we identify the best and the worst organisations? BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;34(1):53-61. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2023-017039.