Study
Published January 2008

Patient safety and telephone medicine: some lessons from closed claim case review.

Katz HP, Kaltsounis D, Halloran L, Mondor M. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:517-522.

Topics
Resource Type
- Journal Article
  - › Study
Approach to Improving Safety
- Error Analysis
- Telemedicine
Safety Target
- Diagnostic Errors
- Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems
Setting of Care
- Ambulatory Care
Target Audience
- Physicians
- Risk Managers
Error Types
- Epidemiology of Errors and Adverse Events
Origin/Sponsor
- United States of America

Cite
Copy Citation:

Katz HP ; Kaltsounis D ; Halloran L; et al. Patient safety and telephone medicine: some lessons from closed claim case review. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23: 517-522

Download Citation File:
- RIS (Zotero)
- EndNote
- BibTex
- Medlars
- ProCite
- RefWorks
- Reference Manager

Share
- Facebook
- Twitter
- Linkedin
- Email
Print

Telephone communication with patients is common in ambulatory practice, but accurately gauging illness severity and formulating an appropriate plan of action may be difficult, leading to potential patient safety issues. This study analyzed telephone-related closed malpractice claims from a large insurance company database in order to elucidate specific types of errors and contributing factors. Most cases alleged that clinicians failed to accurately diagnose the patient; types of errors leading to misdiagnosis included inadequate documentation, faulty triage, and lack of protocols for handling telephone calls. A diagnostic error due to faulty telephone triage is discussed in this AHRQ WebM&M case, and a prior commentary offers practical tips for improving patient triage and management by telephone.

PubMed citation Available at Disclaimer Free full text

Related Resources

Perspectives on Safety

In Conversation With… Reed V. Tuckson, MD

Perspectives on Safety

Telemedicine and Patient Safety

Stephen Agboola, MD, MPH, and Joseph Kvedar, MD

Journal Article › Study

Choice, transparency, coordination, and quality among direct-to-consumer telemedicine websites and apps treating skin disease.

Resneck JS Jr, Abrouk M, Steuer M, et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:768-775.

Journal Article › Study

Variation in quality of urgent health care provided during commercial virtual visits.

Schoenfeld AJ, Davies JM, Marafino BJ, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:635-642.

Journal Article › Study

Telemedicine consultations and medication errors in rural emergency departments.

Dharmar M, Kuppermann N, Romano PS, et al. Pediatrics. 2013;132:1090-1097.

Journal Article › Study

Evaluation of a problem-specific SBAR tool to improve after-hours nurse-physician phone communication: a randomized trial.

Joffe E, Turley JP, Hwang KO, Johnson TR, Johnson CW, Bernstam EV. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39:495-501.

Journal Article › Review

The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview.

Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, et al. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000387.

Journal Article › Study

Is computer-assisted telephone triage safe? A prospective surveillance study in walk-in patients with non-life-threatening medical conditions.

Meer A, Gwerder T, Duembgen L, Zumbrunnen N, Zimmermann H. Emerg Med J. 2012;29:124-128.

Journal Article › Study

The impact of a tele-ICU on provider attitudes about teamwork and safety climate.

Chu-Weininger MYL, Wueste L, Lucke JF, Weavind L, Mazabob J, Thomas EJ. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:e39.

Book/Report

Using Telehealth to Improve Quality and Safety: Findings from the AHRQ Portfolio.

Dixon BE, Hook JM, McGowan JJ, for AHRQ National Resource Center for Health IT. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; December 2008. AHRQ Publication No. 09-0012-EF.